Books & Monographs
- Laudan, Larry. 1984. Science and Values : The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Longino, Helen E. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge : Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
- Proctor, Robert. 1991. Value-Free Science? Purity and Power in Modern Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
- Kitcher, Philip. 2001. Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
- Machamer, Peter, and Gereon Wolters, ed. 2004. Science, Values, and Objectivity. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Kincaid, Harold, John. Dupré, and Alison. Wylie. 2007. Value-Free Science? : Ideals and Illusions. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
- Carrier, Martin, Don Howard, and Janet A Kourany. 2008. The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice: Science and Values Revisited. University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Douglas, Heather. 2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Early Proponents of Value Free Science
- Weber, Max. 1917. Der Sinn der ‘Wertfreiheit’ der soziologischen und ökonomischen Wissenschaften. In Gesammelte Aufsätze Zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1922.
- Ayer, Alfred Jules. 1936. Language, Truth and Logic, Chapter 6. London: Gollancz.
- Merton, Robert K. 1942. The Normative Structure of Science. In The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, edited by Norman W. Storer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Reichenbach, Hans. 1951. The Rise of Scientific Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1997.
The 1950-1980s Debate
pro values:
- Churchman, C West. 1948. Statistics, Pragmatics, Induction. Philosophy of Science 15 (3): 249–68.
- Rudner, Richard. 1953. The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments. Philosophy of Science 20 (1): 1–6.
- Frank, Philipp G. 1954. The Variety of Reasons for the Acceptance of Scientific Theories. The Scientific Monthly 79 (3): 139–45.
contra values or epistemic values only:
- Jeffrey, R. C. 1956. Valuation and Acceptance of Scientific Hypotheses. Philosophy of Science, 23(3), 237–246.
- Levi, Isaac. 1960. Must the Scientist Make Value Judgments? The Journal of Philosophy 57 (11): 345–57.
- Kuhn, Thomas S. 1977. Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice. In The Essential Tension, 320–339. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- McMullin, E. 1982. Values in Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1982(4), 3–28.
ambivalent:
- Hempel, C. 1965. Science and Human Values. In Aspects of scientific explanation: And other essays in the philosophy of science (pp. 81–96). New York: Free Press.
The Recent Debate on Inductive Risk
- Douglas, H. (2000). Inductive Risk and Values in Science. Philosophy of Science, 67(4), 559–579.
- Dorato, Mauro. 2004. Epistemic and Nonepistemic Values in Science. In Science, Values, and Objectivity, edited by Peter Machamer and Gereon Wolters, 52–77. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Douglas, Heather. 2007. Rejecting the Ideal of Value-Free Science. In Value-Free Science: Ideal or Illusion, edited by John Dupre, Harold Kincaid, and Alison Wylie. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
- Wilholt, Torsten. 2009. Bias and Values in Scientific Research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1): 92–101.
- Betz, Gregor. 2013. In Defence of the Value Free Ideal. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (2): 207–20.
- Brown, Matthew J. 2013. Values in Science beyond Underdetermination and Inductive Risk. Philosophy of Science 80 (5). The University of Chicago Press: 829–39.
- Norton, John D. 2014. Epistemic Virtues and Epistemic Values: A Skeptical Critique. Unpublished Draft, 1–18.
- Brigandt, Ingo. 2015. Social Values Influence the Adequacy Conditions of Scientific Theories: Beyond Inductive Risk. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (3): 326–356.
- De Melo-Martin, Inmaculada, and Kristen Intemann. 2016. The Risk of Using Inductive Risk to Challenge the Value-Free Ideal. Philosophy of Science. forthcoming.
The Social Responsibility of Scientists
- Bridgman, Percy Williams. 1947. Scientists and Social Responsibility. The Scientific Monthly 65 (2): 148–154.
- Brown, Matthew J. 2013. The Source and Status of Values for Socially Responsible Science. Philosophical Studies 163 (1): 67–76.
- Dietz, Thomas. 2013. Bringing Values and Deliberation to Science Communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 Suppl : 14081–7.
- Kitcher, Philip. 2004. Responsible Biology. BioScience 54 (4) (April 1): 331.
- Reydon, Thomas, Kostas Kampourakis, and George P Patrinos. 2012. Genetics, Genomics and Society: The Responsibilities of Scientists for Science Communication and Education. Personalized Medicine 9 (6): 633–643.
- Wolpert, Lewis. 2005. Is Science Dangerous? The Medawar Lecture 1998. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 360 (1458): 1253–1258.
Politicization of Science
- Gauchat, Gordon. 2012. Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere a Study of Public Trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review 77 (2): 167–187.
Links & Goodies
- Heather Douglas on the moral responsability of scientists
- Naomi Oreskes on why to trust science
- John Oliver on science communication
- Nancy Cartwright, Thomas Uebel, and Barry Smith discuss Logical Empiricism